Saudi non-oil business activity lifted by stronger demand in Nov, PMI shows
Notre-Dame rebuilt, as Paris nears collapse
India's Adani Group seeks to settle regulatory charge of shareholding violations, ET reports
Taiwan watching Chinese carrier movements as sources say war games may start this weekend
LeBron's jumper is off, and the Lakers are struggling on offense
McMillian's pick-6 helps Broncos spoil career nights by Winston, Jeudy and beat Browns 41-32
Merkel, Obama reunite in Washington for former chancellor's book tour
In a marked shift in America's corporate leadership landscape, female chief executive officers in S&P 500 companies have eclipsed the number of CEOs named John, according to a recent Bloomberg analysis.
Currently, a record 41 women helm S&P 500 businesses, outstripping the 23 CEOs named either John or Jon. This change stands out not only for its statistical significance but also as a testament to the rising influence of women in the echelons of corporate power.
A retrospective glance at similar data offers a poignant narrative of progress. In 2018, The New York Times drew attention to an intriguing comparison: while those named John represented only 3.27% of the American populace, women accounted for over half. That year saw female CEOs edge past their John-named counterparts for the first time. However, the landscape shifted soon after with James-named CEOs gaining prominence, according to Bloomberg.
This dance of numbers and names continued until last year, when ten new female CEOs joined the S&P 500 roster. This change curtailed the predominance of the John-named CEOs. On a lighter note, there's an emerging presence of Jennifers in the CEO space, with three currently at the helm of S&P 500 businesses.
Justin Wolfers, an economist, formulated the Glass Ceiling index in 2015, moved by the significant imbalance between male CEOs and their female counterparts. This index juxtaposed the number of male CEOs against those named James, Robert, John, or William. By this metric, the journey toward gender equality seems longer. Present Bloomberg data underscores this disparity, citing 60 CEOs named James, Robert, or John, vis-à-vis the 41 female CEOs. The tally excludes the Williams. Furthermore, Wolfers's observation to Axios spotlighted an overlooked dimension: the domination of "traditional" American and European names in the CEO realm.
Yet, while this latest statistic might suggest a turning tide in favor of women, the broader picture remains skewed. Men retain a considerable lead, occupying the overwhelming majority of CEO chairs. A mere 8.2% of these top spots in major corporations are occupied by women. While the journey is far from over, the narrative is clear: the balance is shifting, however slowly.
